This worksheet is provided as a webpage. You can Save as / Print to PDF if you like. To write on it, you could then open the PDF in Word.
Regardless of what you are paying attention to in a scene, the entire retinal image is processed a lot prior to your conscious experience of the associated visual information. This form of unconscious processing is sometimes called pre-attentive processing.
Some processing of visual information occurs only via selective attention to that information. This is the reason for the different effects of number of distractors on different visual search tasks, as explained in the visual search chapter of the mini-text.
To bolster your understanding, today you will:
Do you have any questions about the task? If so, ask your tutor.
In that first block of trials you should now have completed, the target was the letter ‘O’.
In some trials, there were lots of distractor letters, and other
trials had very few distractor letters. Do you think the number of
distractor letters had much influence on how long it took you to find
the target?
Was that easier or harder than the previous task?
Write one or two sentences explaining why this task should be easy or hard.
(The feature selection and visual search chapters are relevant.)
Was that easier or harder than the previous task?
_____________________
Write one or two sentences explaining why this task should be easy or
hard.
The data from the visual search task could be graphed on a plot like this:
On some trials, there were only a couple distractors that you had to hunt through to find the target. On other trials, there were a lot of distractors you had to hunt through. Imagine calculating the mean response time for each kind of trial. Add dots to the plot to show what you suspect the data would look like. If you don’t know how to draw on your computer, draw the plot on a piece of paper.
If more distractors increases response time by a lot (a steep slope), that is the sign of capacity-limited processing being required, while a flat slope indicates pre-attentive parallel processing is sufficient to find the target.
(for more, see the Search
chapter of the textbook)
As the visual search experiment illustrated, only a limited number of regions of the visual scene can be processed extensively at the same time. A consequence is that a time-consuming serial search is required for some tasks. By “serial search”, we mean that not all objects could be evaluated simultaneously for whether they are the target. In the letter example, evaluating the combination of color with letter identity requires focused attention rather than happening simultaneously all over the scene.
These issues also manifest in change blindness with, for example, the blank screen sandwich videos discussed in Ch. 6, and shown here:
(If you don’t see an animation, try http://bit.ly/sphinx2016)
2A. How does this change blindness phenomenon illustrate
limited processing capacity?
2B. You probably moved your eyes around a lot as you looked for the
change. Why is that?
2C. Thought question for discussion: Imagine that your vision was equally good throughout the visual field, rather than being best in the center. In that scenario, when would you move your eyes?
A long time ago, Alex moved from the US to the UK (this was before he realized that Australia was the best place to live!). In the UK, he was told that his American driver’s license wasn’t good enough, and to get a UK driver’s licence, he needed to take driving lessons plus a road test.
Alex dutifully took a bunch of driving lessons, and then took a driving test, where the test examiner had him drive around the city for a while.
A few minutes after the test drive, Alex received his results:
Failing the test occurs with one “serious fault” (the ‘S’ column) and/or one “dangerous fault” (the ‘D’ column).
Let’s zoom in on the bottom portion of Alex’s results:
Twelve faults were recorded. Eleven of them were considered minor, including four for having a following distance of less than two seconds’ time behind the next car. The tick-mark in the “traffic lights” row is in the “S” column (column label not shown), which means serious fault. The examiner ticked that because Alex had not braked for a red light they were approaching, until the examiner felt he had to intervene and press on the brake. Oh no! This means that Alex failed the test!
Humiliation galore.
Here is a photograph of a road scene similar to the one where Alex failed to respond quickly enough to the traffic light:
Note that the scene includes a temporary traffic light.
Why might Alex have made the mistake that yielded the
‘serious’ fault?
Is it because he was:
Only the first 3min 17s are important.
What points does he make about eye movements?
By the way, when he uses the word “blurred”, he may not know it but he’s referring to the poor spatial resolution of the periphery (discussed in Chapter 4), not the periphery being literally optically blurry.
The red dot in the movie shows where the eyes are looking, as registered by an eyetracker the driver is wearing. The movie shows where he looks as he drives. Unlike the previous video, the creator does not blur the parts of the scene far from the centre of gaze, but please don’t forget that the driver has good resolution only for the parts of the scene close to the centre of gaze. Where does the driver look when approaching a traffic light?